People who allow fans of men to participate in women’s sports, which exposes biological women to the risk of physical damage and, among other things, deprive them of their lawful places for college and Olympic teams, are rather annoyed by back-to-back-to-to-to-toD Backback losses that has seen her cause since Donald Trump’s re -election -and they beat back. It is not surprising that the people in the California government spend their time looking for ways in order to undermine the policy of vigorous health and the pro-women and the associated proposed legislation (HR 28) from this administration.
According to Ellen Cesaretti-Monroy, Senior Consultant of the California State Assembly Committee for university trainingThe Committee employee found what they found for a “gap” in HR 28, the protection of women and girls in the sports law. The draft law confirms the original intention of the title IX by ensuring that biological men cannot compete in sports that are designated for women and girls in state -funded programs.
In addition, Cesaretti-Monroy implied that California attitude in relation to the future topics of titles IX in relation to law or regulation and explained that she is already working with the office of Attorney General Rob Bonta.
“Lücke” found in HR 28
In this clip, only one participant in the Redstate shared by a participant Community College League of California Legislative Conference At the end of January, Cesaretti-Monroy talks about the “gap” that they supposedly found in HR 28.
As part of their “Trump-Coofing” plan, the CA meeting committee for university consultants Ellen Cesaretti-Monroy tells the participants of the Community College League of the CA-Leg conference that the employees in HR 28 have identified, which they have for a “gap “for a” gap “.
“Transgender … pic.twitter.com/warvqiwwbj
– Jennifer van Laar (@jenvanlaar) 4th February 2025
She said:
Transgender athletes have become a major problem at the federal level due to HR 28. HR 28 states that students – for the purposes of titles IX, if it goes by for athletics, must be obliged to take part in the sport of their biological gender that is defined at birth. We are currently looking for gaps in this guideline. We think loophole.
And we are really relying on the sex capital act. We examine it. We look at it from a perspective if this is the fresh law of the country. If the proper procedures never disappear at this federal level, how can we continue to offer protection for students? How can we continue to offer accommodation? How can we take support measures?
It is not surprising-but you are not surprising that immediately after stating the view that the employees have found a gap in HR 28 remove The proper procedural rights provided those who were accused of violating the IX title.
Plans to undermine Trump’s title IX rule from Trump
HR 28 is a partial reaction to the now dissolved title-ix rule of the bidet management, which “gender identity” has added as a protected class, which means that schools and universities have to be necessary to enable biological men who claim themselves to identify as women to participate in women’s sports or forced other activities, force biological women, changing room and bathroom rooms with biological men who identify as women, and force the students and the faculty, among other things instead of their biological pronouns or facial discipline To apply pronouns of a student.
In addition, the rules of Biden Title IX have removed some protective measures such as the right of the accused of introducing their prosecutor and questioning them. According to the rule of the bidges, the prosecutors and the accused were able to meet privately with title IX administrators instead.
Read more: Bizarre interpretation of titles IX and transgender tenderism of the federal judge Slams Department of Education
University administrators and lobbyists were all for the rule of the bidges administration, and they know that the Trump administration does not return to it. So it looks like the plan of California claims that the Title IX rules in 2020 are a “floor” that only offers basic protective measures and argues that they have the right to have “additional protection” for the “most at risk “Add students, which means that LGBTQ ++ DH DH LGBTQ ++ /transgender student.
Cesaretti-Monroy says:
“[F]or sure [Title IX] Procedure, yes, you have to follow Trump’s regulations. However, we have a state law [Sex Equity Act] This offers additional protection for students on campus – and the employees. It returns to live hearings in certain types of proper procedures for certain types of complaints, but not for all complaints.
“It also does not prevent institutions – If you go one step further and want to carry out additional protective measures over the 2020 Regs, you do not prevent you from doing so. “
She added “[T]Here were certain definitions of what was sexual harassment that were not included in the Trump regulations contained in state law. “
Now we get to the point. Then she was pressed what they were and replied:
“Certain forms of sexual harassment for LGBTQ+ students. They are required – -you are required – According to state law, you have to provide accommodation for you, while according to title IX you don’t necessarily have to. (*28*)sexual harassment” would be. Things like the wrong pronoun or the use of the bathroom/changing room of the gender that you identify on that day or play in the girls’ team when you are a biological man who identifies as a woman.
No fear; The California legislature (well, the Democrats anyway) and the office of the General Prosecutor in California are ready to fight for the right, continue to damage biological women, and describe their actions as “additional protection” for “vulnerable” students.
The state legislator’s attitude – we really rely on the general prosecutor’s office. At that point we were told – we were told that they are prepared and ready to ensure that at a certain time,
In my conversations with the general prosecutor’s office, they were basically so that we are preparing. We will have complaints against them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_31ebbdqze
HR 28 must be adopted
HR 28, which would eliminate this madness, is a tiny and clearly formulated legislation; Here is an example (read the full text of the invoice at the end of this article):
(1) It is a violation of a sub -section (a) for a recipient of the financial support of the federal government, which enables sporting programs or activities to enable a person whose gender is male to take part in a sporty program or activity that is named For women or girls.
(2) For the purposes of this sub -section, sex is recognized exclusively on the reproductive biology and genetics of a person at birth.
Republican chosen civil servants in California, including the supervisor of San Diego County, Jim Desmond, emphasized the congress to say goodbye to HR 28.
It shouldn’t be a controversial statement that men are not allowed to participate in women’s sports – but unfortunately we are here. Athletes lose scholarships, opportunities and even injuries due to unfair competition.
Only last year a high … pic.twitter.com/gzbjxde2zq
– Supervisor Jim Desmond (@jim_desmond) February 3, 2025
Desmond said in a video posted on X:
For me, the stealing of scholarships. This steals trophies. These steal titles that women should have, but instead they are beaten or exceeded by biological men or over -maneuvered. We can no longer have that. We have to keep women’s sports for women and then for men for men. We cannot mix them and cheat women from stains and titles they should have.
He is absolutely right.
Read the full text of HR 28 below:
