Washington (AP)- a surprising step of the IRS, which would enable pastors to support political candidates from the pulpit without losing the tax-free status of their organization, praised conservative and even some progressive religious groups, but the concern of other beliefs as well as tax and right-wing experts.
In a determination of the 1954 Tax Code with the title The Johnson Amendment, churches and other non -profit organizations could lose their tax exemption status if they participate or intervene in a political campaign on behalf of a candidate for a public office. The rule was rarely enforced.
While the IRS did not go that far, the abolition of Johnson change demanded, it says in court documents on Monday that the communication of a church does not “intervene” in its herd or influenced the result of a political campaign.
“The communication of a house of worship to his community in connection with religious services due to its usual communication channels about questions of faith is not compared to the proper interpretation of the Johnson amendment application,” said the IRS.
The up-to-date IRS interpretation took place after decades of debate and finally the national religious radio association and other conservative churches complain that the change violates the rights of the first changes against other legal protective measures.
President Donald Trump spoke to reporters on Wednesday and described the IRS assessment as “great”.
“I love the fact that churches can support a political candidate,” he said. “We have a lot of respect for the people who lead the church.”
While some communities see a up-to-date freedom to speak openly about preferred candidates, other openings for corruption for campaign financing, the up-to-date pressure on religious leaders and a general entanglement between the church and the state.
Praise the IRS
Robert Jeffess, pastor of a Baptist Megachern in Dallas and a Trump allied, called it “the right decision”. He said that the tax-free status of his church had been threatened with an IRS examination of her political advocates, which cost the Megachirche hundreds of thousands of legal costs.
“The IRS has no business that can be said in advance what can be said from the pulpit,” he said. “You have to keep the devils out of our churches.”
The Calvary Chino Chino Hills, a Megachurch in southern California mentioned by Jack Hibbs, has been supporting candidates for years, especially in the local elections. Gina Gleason, director of the Church’s political commitment team, said she hopes that the move will encourage smaller churches that will previously hesitate to trigger an IRS reaction.
“I would have thought that if the IRS had targeted a church, it would have been,” she said. “But we have received a solid legal advice from lawyers and organizations on religious freedom that said that we are in our constitutional rights.”
For Democrats who try to contact people of faith, this decision is in good time, said Doug Pagitt, Pastor and Executive Director of Vote Common Good, a progressive and Protestant Christian organization.
“Conservative pastors who appreciate candidates regardless of the Johnson amendment over the years have led to a disadvantage, which caused the Democrats to move away from the faith voters,” he said. “There was a real imbalance between the more possibilities for Republican voters.”
The IRS declaration, says Pagitt, also ends the dainty dance pastors and the municipalities were forced.
“You could talk about politics in the church high school, but not in the sanctuary or the pulpit,” he said. “Pastors could express political opinions on their personal Facebook page, but not on the church’s website. It’s just silly.”
Church political concerns
Experts in tax and constitutional law are now suspicious of what could arise from the up-to-date position of the IRS.
Philip Hackney, a professor of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, who studies the relationship between church and tax authority, said that the decree could enable the churches to cross up-to-date borders.
“It essentially creates political intervention tax protection for churches,” said Hackney. “It has the potential to corrupt their mission, more towards politics and their real beliefs.”
Other religious groups, especially in faith communities of color, look at it with skepticism. The Rev. Mark Whitlock, Senior Pastor at Reid Temple African Methodist Episcopal Church in Glenn Dale, Maryland, asked more questions than answers.
“Of which of us in the black church, this decision is considered with caution, concern and skepticism,” he said. “The question we ask is: ‘Why now?'”
Whitlock said he would continue to do what the Black Church has always done – educational and civic parishioners. The political views of his meetings also vary.
“When I say something in the church, it has to be gotten, to be god -fearing and a revelation that God gave you,” said Whitlock. “As a campaign manager, you cannot go to the pulpit.”
Raymond Chang, President of the Asian American Christian cooperation, warned that the Johnson amendment could be abolished to combine some municipalities of certain parties or candidates.
“This can lead to a party -political identity becoming the main marker of a church or a community because it is committed to the gospel, which cuts against both major parties,” he said. “Church leaders can also be exposed to pressure to make political notes.”
Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, said on Wednesday that he will find the position of IRS on the subject of “politically comfortable and cynical”.
“We have seen a lot of the pulpit over the years – almost armed in this regard,” said the Democrat in a church in South Carolina.
What’s next?
About 8 out of 10 US -growing beliefs believe that churches and other places of worship should not come out in favor of a political candidate during the elections, as a survey by the PEW Research Center carried out in 2022.
White Evangelical and Black Protestants were somewhat divided on this matter, with about a third in each group favored political notes. However, there was a forceful consensus against political participation by worship houses in every other religious group.
Others are more hopeful than the IRS declaration, which brings unfounded criticism of the agency to bed for a rarely forced rule.
Terry Lemons, a former Irs official who began with the agency under the democratic president Bill Clinton, called it “common sense through a closely written registration”.
Roger Colinvaux, legal professor of the Catholic University of America, said that he would warn churches against “surpassing” the IRS’s explanation. He points out that the word “support” does not appear anywhere in him and said that his greatest concern is that religion is used as a partisan tool in campaigns.
Pagitt at Common Good said that not all pastors will take the opportunity because they may serve a shared community or may not feel comfortable to mix politics and religion.
Chieko Noguchi, spokesman for the US conference of the Catholic bishops, said on Tuesday that the IRS declaration does not “change the way the Catholic Church is in public debates”.
“The Church tries to help Catholics form their conscience in the gospel so that they could see which candidates and guidelines would drive the common good,” said Noguchi. “The Catholic Church maintains its attitude not to have political candidates or have cast off.”
___
Bharath reported from Los Angeles. The Associated Press Writer Meg Kinnard in South Carolina has contributed to the reporting.
___
The reporting on the religion of AP receives support from the cooperation of the AP with the conversation, with the financing of Lilly Stiftment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
