Monday, October 20, 2025
HomeLaborThe Supreme Court will vary the extent of Trump's authority

The Supreme Court will vary the extent of Trump’s authority

Date:

Related stories

The next big movie studios could be in Nevada, according to some unions

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Movies like "The Hangover" and...

Democrats block defense spending bill as tensions rise over shutdown

Senate Democrats voted Thursday to block the annual, year-round...

Senate GOP and Thune throw curveball into shutdown fight

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is throwing an...

Washington (AP) -The Supreme Court said on Monday that it would be considered to expand President Donald Trump’s authority to shape independent agencies by restricting an almost centuries-old decision if President can dismiss the members of the board.

In a 6: 3 decision, the High Court also allowed the Republican President to carry out the dismissal of Rebecca Slaughter, a democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, while the case was taking place.

It is the latest, top -class dismissal that the court has approved in the past few months, which enables the conservative majority to plunge or narrow a decision of the 1935 Supreme Court, in which the commissioners can only be removed due to misconduct or neglect. The majority have previously pointed out that the president probably has the authority with some exceptions to remove board members at will, as these agencies exercise the executive power.

You have suggested that the Federal Reserve could vary, a view that is expected to be tested by the fall of the Fed Governor Lisa Cook.

Judge Elena Kagan, together with Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, talked about the decision that allows the shooting of Slaughter. There are similar decisions that affect three other independent agencies.

“As everyone agrees, the congress banned each of these distances of the president,” wrote Kagan. “But the majority, the residence order, handed over the president to full control over all of these agencies.”

The judges are expected to hear arguments in December as to whether a 90-year judgment called Humphrey’s executor should be canceled.

In this case, the court stood with another FTC commissioner who was released by Franklin D. Roosevelt when the president worked for the implementation of the New Deal. The judges who have found unanimously can only be removed due to misconduct or neglect.

This decision led an era of powerful independent federal authorities who were charged with the regulation of work relationships, discrimination based on the employment relationship and public air waves. But it has long -ranked conservative legal theorists who argue that such agencies should answer the president.

The Ministry of Justice argues that Trump can relieve the board members for some reason if he can carry out his agenda. “The president and the government suffer irreparable damage if the courts themselves transfer part of these executive powers to civil servants about the president’s control,” wrote General Prosecutor D. John Sauer.

He also argued that the judges did not have the power to reintroduce people. Judge Neil Gorsuch made a similar note in February and wrote that employees who win in court can probably be paid back but not being set up again.

The lawyers of Slaughter, however, say that if the President can fire Congress at the desire, regulatory decisions are more based on politics than on their specialist knowledge.

“The congress has closed the protection of the independent regulatory authorities to preserve the integrity of our economy,” said her lawyers in a statement. “To give the executive branch that have not been checked, whoever sits in these bodies and commissions, would have seismic effects on our economy that will harm ordinary Americans.”

The court will hear arguments unusually early in the process before the case has completely worked through the preferences.

The court rejected an advance from two other board members of independent agencies who had asked the judges to hear their cases when they had taken up the slaughter case: Gwynne Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board and Cathy Harris from the Merit Systems Protection Board. These cases will continue to work through the lower courts.

The FTC is a regulatory authority that enforced consumer protection measures and antitrust law. The NLRB examines unfair working practices and monitors the union’s elections, while the MSPB reviews disputes of federal workers.

___

Follow the reporting of the AP on the US Obersten Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court and the Federal Trade Commission at https://apnews.com/hub/fallal-trade-trade-commission.

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here