Friday, March 6, 2026
HomeHealthDemocrats are a party of death, and their lies about abortion still...

Democrats are a party of death, and their lies about abortion still prove this

Date:

Related stories

Speaker Johnson says the House will return to Washington to vote on the shutdown deal

WASHINGTON (AP) — Speaker Mike Johnson said Monday that...

The Senate votes in favor of the proposal to end the 40-day government shutdown

A group of shutdown-weary Democratic senators voted with Republicans...

What is in the legislation to end the government shutdown?

WASHINGTON (AP) — A legislative package to end the...

The Senate has enough Democratic votes to resume government after 40 days of deadlock

Senate Democrats emerged from a two-and-a-half-hour caucus meeting Sunday...

Opinions expressed by colleagues are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Redstate.com.

From the time of overthrow Roe against Wade, RGovernors of the state and legislators seriously treated their involvement in protecting the life of the unborn, in terms of irritation of democrats, who are still nervous, that their national “protection”, which allowed them to murder children of their will, is no longer a constitutional law.

These claims have no grounds in truth. There is no reason to allow unlimited abortion, allow children to be born after unsuccessful abortion, do not receive care and die, or provide people with access to potentially fatal drugs without an adequate examination by a doctor.

These are the same people who still refuse to write and fill prescriptions for ivermectin and hydroxychlorochine in the treatment of Covid, but want the abortion pill to be basic to avoid everyone. In their program there is no little truth or honesty, so they do what they know: they lie.

It started with a combination of miscarriage and abortion. Leftists were afraid of many women to think that if the abortion was repealed, then D&C (extension and spoon), a common procedure used for decades after miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies would not be available to them. Who helped this allegation? Biden administration, straight from the White House account:

In response to this glaring lie, Mark Hemingway He wrote it:

Democrats fell into abortion in this election cycle. From the time the Supreme Court opened in June ROE against Wade Democrats, governing the establishment of the right to abortion in the US Constitution I spent $ 320 million on the advertising of the intracerexiance campaign conducive to the laws of abortion10 times $ 31 million, which they spent on advertising related to inflation, which was consistently assessed as the main problem of voters.

They used these ads and public appearances to develop a legal interpretation of abortion as in this miscarriage and other problem pregnancy to suggest – –– – In a misleading way, the enemies of abortion say – –– – that, according to republican restrictions, women would retain abortion law for the care they receive for common, but even solemn and even life -threatening prenatal complications.

[…]

Each country with abortion provisions has a clear exemption from treatment to save the mother’s life, and such exclusions include ectopic pregnancy.

But, striving for a more sweeping definition of “abortion”, democrats apparently hope to raise the alarm and obstructing republican legislators justification and gaining political support of abortion restrictions.

Because if they can change the definition of abortion, they can extend and then require saving these rights. That is why you hear terms such as: “Abortion is healthcare”, “reproductive laws” and “reproductive justice” about which they are now banded. Politimath also condemned elementary lies sold by the left in ectopic pregnancies.

Left. Media. Medical community. Lockstep in their lies and drums of women’s rights. Everything to justify the right to kill children. This is not only disgusting, it is unsafe and fatal.

They operate the same tactics using mifepriston, an abortion pill. Democrats, activist doctors and cameras in hereditary media paint a medieval Republican plot to prohibit the operate of a pill. Two matters in a federal document are a challenge for state restrictions related to the operate of this pill, saying that they are contrary to the federal guidelines established by Food & Drug Administration (FDA).

WITH Axios:

A pair of lawsuits Restrictions on abortion pills In North Carolina and Western Virginia, they try to decide the question of whether states can regulate and limit drugs approved by the FDA.

Soon after the Supreme Court Turned ROE against WadeIN The Department of Justice has published guidelines Stating that states cannot prohibit Mifepriston, which is used in drug abortions. But this did not stop the Red States from the test, and these two fresh lawsuits set the stage Fight for federal preitlabation.

Details: Lawsuit of North Carolina Challenges state curbs, including a requirement that the tablets are allowed in person by a doctor in a certified surgical square after the required advisory session and 72-hour waiting period.

  • The claim claims that the state “cannot impose additional inspections – including restrictions that the FDA has clearly rejected – which was upset by a carefully balanced regulatory program established by federal law”, in particular referring to federal food, drugs and cosmetic laws.
  • The challenge was made by Amy Bryant, a doctor from North Carolina, who said in a press release that the restrictions on abortion pills “are not supported by medicine or science.”

In West Virginia Genbiopro – the creator of the general Mifepriston – he submitted lawsuit Arguing this No state abortion “He returned the Mifepriston market throughout the state” and negatively affected the access of the residents of the state to the drug, as well as the “ability to conduct business” in this state.

  • The ban on western abortion of Virginia violates Supremation clause of the US Constitution and Commercial clauseThe claim claims.
  • The state has restrictions on abortion drugs, especially prohibiting the operate of telemedicine and requiring the waiting and counseling period before they can be given.

“We are prepared to fully defend the new abortion law in Western Virginia. Although it may not match the producers of abortion drugs, the United States Supreme Court explained that the regulation of abortion is a state issue,” said prosecutor general West Virginia Patrick Morrisey in a statement.

Here’s what Axios doesn’t tell you. Genbiopro, who sucks the state of Western Virginia, probably finances the lawsuit of North Carolina and undoubtedly plans to finance even more of these initiatives of “protecting the rights to abortion”. As a manufacturer of the general version, Mifepristone knows all restrictions on the operate of the drug, they mean less money at their ticket office. They also do not want to set the precedent so that other states (especially purple/blue) can determine the limits that affect their results. So they do everything in their power to repeat the federalization of abortion back to state regulations through the FDA. This is a more unrelated bureaucrat.

The doctor who questions the law in North Carolina is a well -known activist for abortion. Dr. Amy Bryant He is an extraordinary professor and assistant to plan the family director in the field of family planning at the University of North Carolina. In 2016, Dr. Bryant and other planned parenting doctors successfully repealed the changes to 20-week abortion that the legislator of North Carolina tried to pass. Of course, the doctor is looking for lightning to hit twice, so that her industry can still have unlimited ability to facilitate the murder of children with the aid of necessary means.

These cases will establish a precedent anyway. If the court rules the FDA, it means that the rights already in force in southern Dakota, Missouri and Ohio will be hit. If the court rules the states, the pro-life movement was more basic to continue the true protection of women, their health and the life of the unborn.

Expect that the lies campaign will be raised to fever in the next few weeks, especially since the judge supervising one of the matters of abortion is the denominator of Trump Matthew Kacsmaryk.

An example if you can save brain cells.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=droxjuqzzu4

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here