Del. Anitra Hamilton, D-Monongalia, held on Saturday, April 12, 2025 in Charleston, W.VA. (Perry Bennett | West Virginia Legislative Photography) A passionate speech about diversity, equity and recording last night of the legislative period on the House Floor (Perry Bennett | West Virginia)
Through what Senator Joey Garcia, D-Marion, described in the last 30 minutes of the regular session 2025 as “Dirty Tricks”, the Republican legislators in the Senate passed a law on Saturday in order to ban almost all initiatives for diversity, justice and inclusion in the state of West Virginia.
The house said goodbye to the house after almost three hours of debate at 10:41 p.m.
When the draft law on the Senate priority, 13 changes from Garcia seemed to be pending for legislation.
Then there was confusion.
Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, applied for the legislative common rule 3-a rule that regulates how changes and disagreements between the two legislative chambers are treated. This application was accepted and the Senate then agreed with the version of the law 31-2 and existed without taking the changes from Garcia.
After a low break, Tarr pulled his first application for suspension of the common rule 3 due to a technical error after a low break – and as several lawyers and the parliamentarian of the chamber on the podium of the Senate President Randy Smith. The vote would have to be done again.
Another member then moved the previous question to take into account the common application of rule 3 again and to vote with the version of the house and to hand over the version of the house Senate Bill 474. Here, too, the Senate approved the legislation with 31-2.
As a movement after confusing application, the microphones for Garcia and Senator Mike Woelel, D-Cabell-Die only voices were tuned on the draft law, while trying to access points of the order of TARRS applications and Smith’s decisions.
In an interview after the chaos, Smith said R-Preston that he also did not quite understand the legislative procedures that led to the adoption of SB 474.
“This was a procedure that I have never seen in the house or in the Senate in my 13 years,” said Smith “… We have a parliamentarian who knows the rules very well, probably better than any other in the Senate. Senator Tarr knows the process very well … as far as it concerns me than the procedure and the rules was all in order.”
If this were not the case, someone must contest the legitimacy of the law in court. But for now it goes to governor Patrick Morrisey’s desk for approval.
Garcia said in an interview after the Senate Sinus postponed for the meeting, he believed that it had a “legal defect” in legislation.
“I have questions whether this calculation actually happened,” said Garcia. “… [Republicans in the Senate] I will take abbreviations, regulate whatever it takes to say goodbye to your agenda. ”
Senate Bill 474 Provides the offer of specific services or opportunities for people who on their breed, color, ethnicity, country of origin and. in some casesSex.
The legislation only applies to the guidelines and initiatives in state and local governments and schools, including universities in university formation.
Garcia’s attempt to hold the bill came after his colleagues in the house – mainly democrats – used similar tactics. There, 27 changes were submitted by the legislators. Only three of them were adopted.
The steps tuned included the steps to the Crown Act – a policy that prohibits discrimination based on hairstyles and textures in the legislation, as well as the inclusion of non -discrimination measures that are based on political beliefs and apply parts of the law from the application to veterans.
The Democrats in the body held fiery speeches against the overall laws, namely del. Anitra Hamilton, D-Monongalia, which is one of only three black legislators in state legislation.
Hamilton told her colleagues that DEI measures are not about giving people with color or other classes special treatment. It is about everyone has the same ability to apply for the same opportunities and access the same options.
She shared her experiences with system racism in West Virginia and especially in the legislature. Her points were made by her colleagues, the minority leader Sean Hornbuckle, D-Cabell, and DEL. Hollis Lewis, D-Kanawha, repeated, who are also black.
Hamilton, not recognizing the existence of racism or sexism, will only hold back West Virginia.
“Diversity, justice and inclusion are important,” said Hamilton. “If we do not accept these principles, we have no bones in the breed of this garden brawl. We will continue to lose every year … I only pray that we can not only abolish this legislation, we can abolish the mentality and ideology that goes hand in hand with it and energy and energy.”
They enable our work.
