While the Democrats are notorious to make some rather scratchy statements, the disturbing state of their combined Trump Musk Derderbs syndrome has increased their bizarre on a completely up-to-date level of failure in recent weeks.
For example we had that other Mad Maxine, Resedan Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-OR), explains this week during an American anti-musk American of the government employees that “we f ** k Trump!” The original Mad Maxine, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), has also become red, screaming at Musk’s explosion and screaming the fanatical Democrat members of the congress from storming the education department.
Then there was the Senator redirect leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who gestured wildly while he repeatedly screamed: “We will win!” In addition to waters outside the finance department.
See also->> ‘Keep it up!’ Jasmine Crockett is taught a tough lesson after the ‘Flunky’ attack on JD Vance
Then there was Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-il), who insulted the intelligence of women everywhere with an explanation that she did during a subcommittee for household, production and trade hearing Wednesday about AI in the manufacture.
While he questioned one of the witnesses, the 80 -year -old Schakowsky wondered why in her opinion it was so complex to have more female representation in the production industry. Before she handed it over to the witness to answer, the congressioner speculated about possible reasons why (fat focus added):
“Yesterday I met with a manufacturing company, but they are also busy dealing with teenage people more for manufacturing. So I asked her: “So how many students who want to register and want to do so, how many are women?” And they said: “Well, I know, I know that there is at least 13 percent or so.” It was a low number. And they had mentioned that they tried to include more women in the production. II just wonder if only the name ‘Manufacturing’ sounds like a guy?“”
Regard:
MP Jan Schakowsky (D) suggests that the reason why more women do not go into production is that “the name manufacture sounds like a type”.pic.twitter.com/l0dndiamiy
– Libs from Tultok (@libsoftikok) February 13, 2025
To mention unnecessarily that some of their colleagues were not amused on the Republican side:
We: Let us lead the way and bring jobs back to America 🇺🇸
Democrats: “Manufacturing” is a sexist term against women! pic.twitter.com/dtehdafcuh
– Congressman Gabe Evans (@Repgabevans) February 12, 2025
Even other “progressive” democrats crawled openly, like the founder/host of “Young Turks”, Cenk Uygur.
“If a democratic leader suggests using the word” women’s production “, we lose every choice for the rest of my life” threatens On the Twitter/X machine.
Conservative Radio -Talk show presenter Erick Erickson wiped“Think of all women who never get a manicure because it sounds like a type. And damn it, maybe we have to transform the gynecologist into something else.”
And “menstrual cycle” must be changed under this way of thinking, as well as “shaft cover” etc. The list is endless (and asinine).
Apart from jokes, statements such as Schakowsky’s about the word “production” are supposedly triggered enough to keep women away from this specific workforce sensitively, covered too snow, in order to compete in an industry dominated by men.
Women who are difficult enough to learn a certain manufacturing trade and pursue careers are not butterflowers “words are violence” types, Frauschakowsky.
I also wonder if the Schakovsky of America ever thought about the possibility that there may not be many women in manufacturing just because a majority of women have found other fields with far more pliant timetables that are more tea cups ?
Maybe in most cases it just runs out on it, and nothing more. But as usual with the Democrats, if everything else fails, they accuse men.
Wash, rinse, repeat. It never ends. I wish it would stop, but here we are.
